An explanation of changes in Austin Tax Rates
So the new tax rates for Austin real estate have been released. I have been getting alot of questions about Austin taxes recently so I figured I would write a blog to explain some of the recent changes.
Since property values have gone up quite a bit, some people were expecting hefty increases in their property taxes. Since property tax bills have been sent out some people have been surprised that their property taxes did not go up that much. The reason for this is that the tax rate for Austin has decreased. The full list of Austin Tax Rates for 2006 are located here
To start off, let's look at the tax rate for this year compared to last. I'm going to look at the property taxes for a house in the Austin ISD, which is most houses in central Austin.
In 2005, the tax rate was:
2005
Austin ISD 1.6230
City of Austin .4430
Travis County .4993
Travis County hospital district .07790
Austin Community College .0991
Total 2.7423
In 2006, the new tax rate is:
2006
Austin ISD 1.4930
City of Austin .4126
Travis County .4499
Travis County hospital district .0734
Austin Community College .0965
Total 2.5254
Overall the tax rate decreased by about 9.2 percent. There are two main things which led to a lower tax rate.
First is the lowered school tax rate. School taxes generally compromise the largest part of ones property taxes. The state finally lowered school taxes by increasing taxes on businesses. The taxes for Austin ISD went from 1.6230 to 1.4930. The good news is that the school taxes are scheduled to be phased in over two years. This year the taxes were to be reduced by 0.13. Next year they are scheduled to be reduced again but this time by .33.
The next thing that was reduced was city related taxes. This includes: 1) the city of Austin tax which was reduced from .4430 to .4126, 2) The Travis county tax which was reduced from .4993 to .4499, 3) the hospital district which was reduced from .0779 to .0734, and 4) the community college tax which was reduced from .0991 to .0965.
So why were all four of these tax rates reduced? The answer is basically that average real estate values in Austin went up. Generally as real estate values go up, tax rates can go down and vice versa. Why is this? If you have a town of 1000 people whether the average house is 100k or 1 million you still need about the same amount of city infrastructure. Regardless of the house prices you need about the same number of roads and the same number of fire stations and the same number of police stations.
This explains why the city tax rate went down this year as the property values went up. This also explains the city tax rates for a few other cities in Travis country in the general Austin area. The cities are listed from lowest to highest tax rates. One can see that the relationship to house prices is roughly the inverse.
| City | Tax Rate | Average House Price |
| City of West Lake Hills | .0534 | 628,333 |
| City of Rollingwood | .1200 | 558,194 |
| City of Lakeway | .2200 | 443,733 |
| City of Manor | .3981 | 156,965 |
| City of Austin | .4126 | 226,700 |
| City of Jonestown | .5600 | 198,217 |
| City of Lago Vista | .5969 | 221,123 |
| City of Pflugerville | .6240 | 161,500 |
And just because Im a dork I made this relationship graph where I plotted the different cities.

There are some exceptions but in general cities with higher average house values tend to have lower city taxes. Again, this is because someone in a million dollar house and someone in a 80k house tend to use about the same amount of city services such as roads, fire departments and police departments. Pflugerville has high taxes because the houses tend to be less expensive. To pay for the basic public services you need to tax each house more. On the other hand, West Lake has pretty expensive houses and can have a low tax rate to pay for the same basic public services.
So in summary. Austin property values went up. This allowed Austin to lower the tax rate. OK thats my blog. A bunch of talk about taxes.

Comments
You also have to consider the fact that those other cities don't provide half the services that Austin does; from having to pay for MOST of our OWN big roads to having a real library, etc.
I think I remember reading that Pflugerville is disproportionately high for utility-related reasons (water?)
Posted by: M1EK | December 9, 2006 09:05 AM
You are absolutely correct regarding Austin Taxes as it relates to additional services. I thought about including this but then took it out. I probably should have left it in because its an important point. Austin has higher taxes than it could have. While other surrounding cities simply pay for basic services Austin pays for a multitude of additional things like parks, city centers, hike and bike trails, arts funding, and the trail of lights. Personally I don't think Austin would be the same without these things but they certainly add to our tax bill. Also we pay for most of our major roads. Another issue is the surrounding towns enjoy the amenities that Austin has built but don't pay for many of them.
The water issues for Pflugerville might have been associated with MUDs. A MUD is a municipal utility districts. The above tax rates was for a house located with in the city proper of Pflugerville. Many houses in Pflugerville are located on the outskirts of Pflugerville which get their water from a MUD. There is an additional tax associated with being in a MUD. So getting their utilities like water from a MUD causes these houses to have even higher taxes.
03 TRAVIS COUNTY 0.449900
19 PFLUGERVILLE ISD 1.680000
2H NE TRAVIS CO UTILITY DIST 0.930000
2J TRAVIS CO HEALTHCARE DIST 0.100000
9B TRAVIS CO ESD NO 2 0.100000
This house would have a tax rate of 3.2872. This is pretty high compared to a tax of 2.9812 for a house in city proper of Pflugerville and a tax rate of 2.5254 for a house in Austin.
I also just updated my original blog. I added some additional cities and put in a graph to show the relationship between house prices and city tax rates.
Posted by: escapeso | December 9, 2006 06:00 PM
Just wanted to compliment you on your clear and concise explanation of tax rates. It has inspired me to do something similar for my blog (in France). However, I think that local services and amenities are important, adding to the quality of life, so one should consider them when evaluating local tax rates.
Posted by: Robert (property agent) | January 5, 2007 04:00 AM
I agree with you Robert. When looking at tax rates what people get from those taxes is important. Its hard to compare Austin to cities in other states since Texas doesnt have income taxes. But if you compare Austin to Houston its interesting. On the first hand Austin has a lower tax rate than Houston. But, in addition to that, Austin has alot more parks and city amenities per person than Houston.
Posted by: admin | January 5, 2007 09:24 PM
Another thing to consider is that perhaps housing prices in Texas and the Austin area remain relatively low BECAUSE of property taxes, instead of the other way around. Property values are directly tied to what someone can afford in monthly payments - high property taxes have likely been a large contributor to why there is no price bubble (or much less of one) here like most of the rest of the country, despite Texas' high growth rate.
Posted by: phil | March 16, 2007 04:40 PM